Louisiana Lawyer Dot Com

Exampes of Notable Verdicts in the United States

June 2005, Eli Lilly & Co. announced that it will pay $690 million to settle approximately three-quarters of the liability claims against Zyprexa, its great-selling anti-psychotic drug. The lawsuits claim that the labeling on Zyprexa medications failed to provide adequate warning that the drug could put patients at risk for developing diabetes and other glucose problems.

2006 - Environmental Damages Toxic Tort - A federal jury verdict has awarded thousands of property owners $352 million for property damage caused by the closed Rocky Flats nuclear bomb plant in Colorado.

August - 2006 - 51 MILLION DOLLARS - Awarded by Federal Court Jury in New Orleans - Merck faced 2 major setbacks in the same week. In New Orleans, the court and jury found that Merck "knowingly misrepresented or failed to disclose" information about Vioxx to retired FBI agent Gerald Barnett's doctors.- Awarding $50 million in compensatory damages along with $1 million in punitive damages, saying Merck "acted in wanton, malicious, willful or reckless disregard for the plaintiff's rights." Further, on the same day in New Jersey, state Superior Court Judge Carol Higbee ruled that new evidence uncovered since the November verdict showed that Merck withheld information showing heart attacks could come with use of Vioxx for less than 18 months.

2005 - In what may be one of the biggest massive medical malpractice tort verdicts in the state of Texas, a state jury awarded $606 million - including a remarkable $ 600 million dollars in punitive damages - to the family of an 82-year-old patient who had cancer and then who died after receiving an overdose of chemotherapy drugs. 2005 -

In the 9th big loss for Ford in SUV Explorer rollover cases, a Florida jury awarded $61.2 million to the parents of an 18-year-old boy who was killed in a 1997 (wrongful death & Product Defect and Product Liability Issues)

A Jury in New Jersey found recently that Vioxx significantly contributed to a 77-year-old man's heart attack awarded him $9 million in punitive damages, raising Merck & Co.'s liability in the case to $13.5 million and intensifying pressure on it to settle such lawsuits.

Example of Personal Injury Case 2004 : Ford Explorer rollover-prone and roof not crash safe and worthy- CASE TYPE : Product Design Defect, Auto Truck Vehicle - SUV, Motor Vehicle – Rollover CASE : Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., San Diego Co., Calif., Super. Ct. GIC 800836 Los Angeles, Calif. JURY VERDICT: ($369 Millions Dollars)

Example of Personal Injury Lawyer Case 2004 : Dodge Caravan seatback collapsed on baby in a car-seat - CASE TYPE : Automobiles, Products Liability - Product Design Defect, Wrongful Death, Motor Vehicle - Rear-ender, Motor Vehicle - Passenger, Motor Vehicle - Minivan CASE : Flax v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., Davidson Co., Tenn., Cir. Ct. O2C-1288 JURY VERDICT : $105,500,000 (105 Million Dollars )

Mass Toxic Tort Verdicts - The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, in a published decision, upheld the July 2003 jury verdict in favor of: Angel Gomez, who died following the trial, and the late Daniel Tucker. Both gentlement worked with and around asbestos-containing welding rods. The NY jury awarded Gomez a total of approximately $3.19 million against Lincoln Electric Company ("Lincoln"), reduced 25 percent since Gomez was a cigarette smoker. Tucker's estate was granted a total of approximately $3.5 million split between Lincoln and Hobart Brothers Company ("Hobart").

2005 – Billion Dollar Verdicts - In one of 2005's largest verdicts to an individual plaintiff regarding financial fraud , a Florida jury ordered Morgan Stanley Broker Dealer to pay $1.45 billion to investor Ronald O. Perelman for defrauding him in the sale of his camping gear company - Coleman.

2005 - February, a prominent Houston law firm and a Texas bank were SMACKED and Beaten with a $65.5 million verdict in a highly complex estate planning case that involved major problems and conflicts of interest. (65 million dollar jury award)

2004 - Bar liable for worker who got drunk on the job & hit construction flagger - CASE TYPE: Dram Shop Drunk Driver - Motor Vehicle - Alcohol Involvement CASE: Tuski v. Ivyland, Philadelphia Co., Pa.,Ct. C.P. Feb. Term 2002 No. 4436 JURY VERDICT: $75,684,000 75 Million Verdict

2005 – 3 years after a jury acquitted a company in Florida of manslaughter and criminal charges, a Florida civil jury SLAMMED the outdoor advertiser with a $65 million jury award verdict for the shock and electrocution of a sixth-grade boy.

Jet Pilot Wins $64 Million For Age Discrimination - In December, a Los Angeles California jury found that PrivatAir - an aviation company focusing on private airline services - wrongfully fired Captain Doyle D. Baker on the basis of his age, defaming him in the termination process and causing extreme emotional distress. *2005

"The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision
that should not be based solely upon advertisements."

Verdicts on the website are used to notify persons in the US regarding national litigation and are only examples of class actions or large jury verdicts for law firms around the country. These examples are not used to imply the possibility of recovery but as information about particular cases in various specialties that may be of interest to viewers.

Notice to Residents of Various States or Territories or Countries.
This website is not intended for the purpose of marketing to any prospective clients residing outside of the State of LA for the commencement of any civil action outside of the State of LA. In any action outside of the State of LA an attorney who may receive any complaint that you submit who may be affiliated with this website would do so in association with a member of the respective State Bar who may serve as co-counsel in the litigation. Mentz Law, LLC may also have affiliations with attorneys licensed to practice in many states in or outside of the United States. * Images may not be actual people from a law firm
The information on this site pertains to Louisiana Cases, Federal Cases, and Class Actions investigations only and is offered as a public information service. It is not intended to give legal advice about a specific legal problem, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Due to the importance of the individual facts of every case, the general information we provide may not necessarily be applicable to any particular issue. Changes in the law could at any time make parts of this web site obsolete or inaccruate. This information is provided with the understanding that if legal advice is required that the services of a competent attorney should be sought by YOU. If you leave our site to another domain, please read their terms, policies, and disclaimers before taking ANY action.
The written content herein and this web site may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable professional conduct, legal, or ethical rules. The decision and selection of legal services and the choice of an attorney or lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon websites, advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise.
This content and website is for informational purposes only. The investigations content or information within this website is NOT intended or NOT meant to constitute legal advice. FURTHER, the information does not, should not, or may not reflect the opinions of the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC, its owners, attorneys, agents, assigns, successors, or clients.
This information does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC and the viewers or visitors of the web pages or website. IF you leave our servers to another domain, please carefully read the terms, disclaimer, privacy, or conditions of any of your actions. Neither the transmission nor receipt of this website content, wording, or information will create an attorney-client relationship between sender and viewer or receiver. The information contained and included herein is general in scope and nature become a case, may not apply to your issue, and may not be completely accurate or updated do to the rapidly changing laws, technology, and legal or scientific findings. The content and material in this website may not be updated material that reflects subsequent developments or law or other. Internet or online readers of this website should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel.
Please read carefully all information herein so that you understand the terms of use of this website before using it. By using this Website, it is IMPLIED THAT YOU have accepted these terms of use.. If you do not accept our terms of use, please leave this website immediately. Thank you. G. Mentz is a licensed attorney and member of the Mentz Firm Law, LLC and all services herein and contact forms or communications may be managed Mentz Firm Law, LLC or outside counsel
Content and Material
*Since legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, and since laws are constantly changing, nothing you read on our website should be used as a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. In other words, do not rely on what you read on this or any website without first checking with a real, live attorney in person. Jury Verdicts are taken from top awards in the United States. There is no guarantee of representation or award for anyone who visits this site. Examples of awards are for illustrative purposes only. Information is not deemed accurate as many awards are changed or reduced or taken from websites with informatin that may not be perfect of accurate. Please research jury verdicts on your own to confirm these awards.

Your Email or Communications with US
This website, its owner, manager, associated lawyers, or affiliates are under no obligation to respond to unsolicited e-mails or inquiries. If you contact us in any means of communication and do not receive a response OR hear from a lawyer or agent of ours within five days, you should assume that the firm, its attorneys, and its affiliates are unable to help or advise you and you are strongly encouraged to contact another lawyer as soon as possible.
Expiration of Your Case
This website, its owner, manager, associated lawyers, agents or affiliates, do not accept communication regarding cases within 65 days of the expiration of your respective statute of limitations for your case.
Limited Linking; No Framing
You may link to this Site on another web site only if: (1) the link is a text only link clearly marked "Class Action Lawsuit "; (2) the link "points" to the URL "http://www.myclassactionlawsuit.com" and not to other pages within this Site; (3) the appearance, text, location and other aspects of the link do not damage or dilute the goodwill associated with Class Action Lawsuit's name, brand, intellectual property, and servicemarks, and may not suggest any false association with, or sponsorship by, Class Action Lawsuit; (4) when activated by the user, the link displays this Site in full screen and not "framed" by the linked Site or other material; and, (5) Class Action Lawsuit reserves the right (in its sole discretion) to revoke its consent to the link at any time.
Personal information submitted to the website
Any information that you send us in an email message should not be considered confidential, secure, or privileged. Remember, no technology server is 100 percent safe or secure, and you agree to this before submitting personal or confidential data about yourself on any website, including this one or a site that is linked to this site. Additionally, while the website does not gather your name, email address or similar information about you without your knowledge or consent, the website does permit you to voluntarily submit information or data about yourself or family member or friend so that we may provide you with requested feedback.
If you are interested in having an attorney represent you, you should call so someone can provide a personal interview. The telephone numbers for the legal offices are listed in the contact forms. Attorneys reserve the right to decline any representation. Sometimes lawyers are required to decline representation if it
Legal Notice, Terms, and Disclaimers
The information provided on the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC website is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues that may be affecting people or are commonly encountered. This information is not intended to create any type of legal relationship between the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an lawyer-client relationship between sender and receiver or viewer.
The information is not guaranteed to be updated, accurate, correct, complete, or current. This site makes no warranty, expressed or implied or otherwise, about the correctness, accuracy or reliability of the content or information within or on this website or at any other website that this site may contain links leading to.
This website is not intended to create and does not create an attorney-client relationship between the user and the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC. An attorney-client relationship with us cannot be formed by reading the information at this website. Please be advised that the only way to become a client is through a mutual agreement between a licensed lawyer and client. This website is not soliciting clients and does not mandate or make proposal for any type of transaction. You should not act or rely on any information at this website without seeking the advice of an licensed lawyer or attorney. The determination of whether you need the services of an attorney or lawyer and your choice of an attorney or lawyer are very important issues that should not be based on websites or anyone’s advertisements.would create a conflict of interest with other clients.
Terms or Disclaimers may be modified at any time
The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC periodically changes, adds, or updates the content disclaimers terms and material in this website without notice. The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC assumes no liability or responsibility for any mistakes errors or omissions in the contents of this website. Viewers or users of this website should understand that you use this site at your own risk. In no way should the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC or any other party involved in the creation, production or delivery of this website be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access, use of, or connection to this website.
Domain Names
If you have entered this site because of the Spelling of the Domain name, please be aware that this website may not use the domain name in its legal name. The domain name itself is not an indicator that we are from any part of the world or city geographically. Anyone can buy domain names with various geographic words included in it.
Banners, Links, Law Firm Contact Forms or Listings
Any information in that is a banner, link or complaint form may be a listing of lawyers from KGLG and the form provided is controlled and provided by the listees. The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC does not warrant the validity of the information, nor does it guarantee the quality of the work product.
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based only upon advertisements, websites, internet information, or self-proclaimed expertise. The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC does not review the contents of the listings or any external links, which are controlled by the listees or any links; the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC is not responsible for any material or information contained in the linked sites or provided by outside parties or listees.
A biography, description or indication practice areas by a lawyer does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in any indicated field of law practice, and does not imply that such lawyer is necessarily any more of an expert, skilled, or competent than any other lawyer.
All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered.
Third-party Links, Webpages or websites
This website may occasionally contain links to third party websites for the convenience of our users. The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC does not endorse any of these third party sites and does not intend to imply any association between the firm and the outside websites or parties involved. Additionally, the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC does not control these third party websites and cannot represent that their information is accurate or correct. You agree to use any link on this site at your own risk and you understand that you are leaving this website and entering another website that is not owned or operated or controlled by us. If you use any links to websites not maintained by the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC, you do so at your own risk. The Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC is not responsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient.
Ownership, License & Restrictions On Use
As between the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC and you, all right, title and interest (including all copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property rights) in this website belongs to the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC, its licensors, or express affiliations or alliances. In addition, the names, intellectual property, images, pictures, logos and icons identifying the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC’s products and services wherever this site may be viewed are proprietary marks of the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC and/or its express subsidiaries or alliances. Except as expressly provided, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right to anyone to use our content or any intellectual property. If anyone desires to use, reprint, or otherwise copy or display or show anyone any of the content from this site, you agree to contact use in writing 30 days prior to any duplication or display of any information from this site to another person and any context. We maintain the exclusive right to reject your request.
You are hereby granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to view information retrieved from this website provided solely for your personal, informational, non-commercial and non harassment purposes, and provided you do not remove or obscure the copyright notice or other notices. Except as provided above, no part of this website, including but not limited to materials retrieved there from and the underlying code, may be reproduced, republished, copied, transmitted, or distributed in any form or by any means whatsoever. In no event shall materials from this website or webpages be stored in any information storage and retrieval system without prior written permission from the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC.
Governmental Restricted Rights Legend
Use, duplication, or disclosure by the United States Government is subject to the restrictions set forth in DFARS 252.227-7013 (c)(1)(ii) and FAR 52.227-19.
Limitation Of Liability
A distinguished party (as defined below) shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages of any kind whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and lost profits or savings) in any way due to, resulting from, or arising in conjunction with the connection to this site, including its content, regardless of any negligence of any distinguished party. "distinguished party" means the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC, its affiliates, agents, lawyers, employees, its listees, and any officer, director, employee, subcontractor, agent, successor, or assign of the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC, its affiliates, alliances, and its listees.
Governing laws in case of dispute; jurisdiction
These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Louisiana, USA, as they apply to agreements made and solely performed therein. Disputes arising hereunder shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts of The Eastern District of Louisiana of the United States of America and/or the state courts of Louisiana and jurisdiction therefore shall rest solely in Louisiana, USA.
Entire Agreement; Severability
These Terms of Use incorporate by reference any notices contained on this Site and constitute the entire agreement with respect to your access to and use of this Site. If any provision of these Terms and Conditions is unlawful, void or unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions and shall not affect their validity and enforceability.
Material available in the Legal Services Co. of Mentz Law, LLC website is protected by copyright law. Copyright © 2002-04
Information Transmission: Please remember that any information submitted on any website or any interview does not create a lawyer client relationship.
State Disclaimers:
Alabama
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(e) (1997).
Alaska
The Alaska Bar Association does not accredit or endorse certifying organizations. Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(a)(2) (1998).
Arkansas:
The information provided in this Web site does not constitute legal advice for any individual or business entity. Each visitor should seek the personal advice of a lawyer for his individual case. The communication of any information in this firm site does not establish an attorney-client relationship between you and the website owner, Law Firm or anyone. The communication by electronic mail between a lawyer or attorney or any agent of this or any website and any visitor does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The content of this advertisement is the responsibility of the named contact person.
Colorado:
Colorado does not certify attorneys as specialists in any field.
California:
Every case is unique and outcomes will vary depending upon the facts and legal issues of your case. Please do not make any decisions about any legal issue or matter without consulting with an attorney first. There is no Attorney-Client relationship formed by any use of the information provided. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements.
This content is intended to give an overview of the information presented, and should never be used as a substitute for seeking expert advice for your particular matter. Please be aware that laws and procedures are constantly changing and are subject to differing interpretations. This publication cannot substitute for the independent judgment and skills of a competent attorney or other licensed professional. Non-attorneys are cautioned against using these materials to conduct decisions or a lawsuit without advice or assistance from a licensed attorney in the jurisdiction at hand. Non-attorneys are also cautioned against engaging in conduct that might be considered the unauthorized practice of law.
Delaware
"Listing of areas of practice does not represent official certification as a specialist in those areas." [Rule 7.1(b)(1)] The Delaware Lawyer's Rules of Professional Conduct (1985)
Florida
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.
Florida Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4-7.2(d) (1997).
Hawaii
There is no procedure for review or approval of specialist certification organizations in Hawaii.
Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c) (1997).
Illinois
The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law and that the certificate, award or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in Illinois.
Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c)(2) (1997).
Iowa
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Memberships and offices in legal fraternities and legal societies, technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, technical and professional associations and societies of law or field of practice do not mean that a lawyer is a specialist or expert in a field of law, nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer.
A description or indication of limitation of practice does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in an indicated field of law practice, nor does it mean that such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer.
All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
See Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(A), DR 2-101(C), DR 2-105(A)(3)(c) (1997).
Kentucky :
THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT. Kentucky
"This is an advertisement. Kentucky law does not certify specialties of legal practice." [Rule 3.135(5)(b)(ii)] Kentucky Rules of the Supreme Court (1990)
Louisiana
Per Louisiana Rule of Professional Conduct 7.4, any description of an attorney biography or resume does not imply certification, specialization or expertise in any particular areas of law, unless a particular lawyer lists or holds a certification or other expertise recognized by the applicable State Bar or regulatory authority. G. Mentz is a licensed attorney and member of the Mentz Firm Law, LLC and all services herein and contact forms or communications may be managed by outside counsel
Maryland:
Material contained in this web site is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice or solicitation of legal services. Transmission of information from this site is not intended to create, and its receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between the law firm, or owners or managers of this website and the reader. In the event that any information on this web site does not conform fully with regulations in any jurisdiction, this legal services firm will not accept representation based on that information.
Massachusetts
If a Massachusetts lawyer holds himself or herself out as "certified" in a particular service, field or area of law by a non-governmental body, the certifying organization is a private organization, whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
See Massachusetts Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-105(B) (1997).
Minnesota: An attorney who is certified as a specialist under the National Board of Trial Advocacy (NBTA) may communicate the fact that the attorney has been or was certified by that particular certifying agency as a specialist in the area of law involved.
Mississippi
The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements.
Free Background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney.
The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein.
See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997).
Missouri
Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations.
Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1997).
Nevada
Neither the state bar of Nevada nor any agency of the State Bar has certified any lawyer identified here as a specialist or as an expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability.
Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 198 (1997).
New Jersey
Any certification as a specialist, or any certification in a field of practice, that does not state that such certification has been granted by the Supreme Court of New Jersey or by an organization that has been approved by the American Bar Association, indicates that the certifying organization has not been approved, or has been denied approval, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the American Bar Association.
See New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(b) (1997).
New York
The information on this site pertains to Class Actions only and is offered as a public information service. It is not intended to give legal advice about a specific legal problem, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Due to the importance of the individual facts of every case, the generalizations we make may not necessarily be applicable to any particular issue. Changes in the law could at any time make parts of this web site obsolete. This information is provided with the understanding that if legal advice is required the services of a competent attorney should be sought. If you leave our site to another domain, please read their terms and disclaimers before taking any action.
New Mexico
Any certification by an organization other than the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization does not constitute recognition by the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization, unless the lawyer is also recognized by the board as a specialist in that area of law.
See New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 16-704(D) (1997).
North Carolina
"Representations of specialty do not indicate state certification of expertise." [Rule 2.5] Rules of Professional Conduct (1985)
North Dakota: Colorado and North Dakota do not certify attorneys as specialists in any field.
Oregon: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT.
Pennsylvania:
Since legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, and since laws are constantly changing, nothing you read on our website should be used as a substitute for the advice of your own attorney. In other words, don't rely on what you read on this website without first checking with a real, live attorney.
Rhode Island
The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law. The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.
Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1998).
South Dakota
"Notice: For the general information of the public. Attorneys listing areas of practice...have not been certified by the State Supreme Court of South Dakota, or the state bar of South Dakota, as having any more experience or being any more competent in these areas than any other attorney. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any attorney being considered." [Rule 7.4] Rules of Professional Responsibility (1988)
Tennessee
Unless otherwise indicated, Tennessee attorneys are not certified as specialists by the Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education and Specialization in the areas of practice listed on their profiles.
See Tennessee Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(C)(3) (1998).
Texas
Unless otherwise indicated, Texas attorneys are Not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in the areas of practice listed on their profiles.
See Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.04(b)(3) (1999).
Virginia:
Material contained in this web site is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice or solicitation of legal services. Transmission of information from this site is not intended to create, and its receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between the law firm, or owners or managers of this website and the reader. In the event that any information on this web site does not conform fully with regulations in any jurisdiction, this legal services firm will not accept representation based on that information.
Washington
The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize certification of specialties in the practice of law. Any certificate, award, or recognition by a group, organization or association used by a Washington attorney to describe his or her qualifications as a lawyer or qualifications in any subspecialty of law is not a requirement to practice law in the State of Washington.
See Washington Rules of Professional Responsibility Rule 7.4(b) (1997).
Wyoming
The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise.
Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law Rule 7.4 (1997).
To the extent that regulatory or State Bar rules require websites to designate a principal office and/or single attorney responsible for this site. George S. Mentz, Esq. of Mentz Law, LLC. Mailing Address: 8201 Peach St., New Orleans, LA 70118 Phone: 504-495-1748 *

"The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision
that should not be based solely upon advertisements."